In this my talk
we shall study the convergence of series with positive terms in connection with
a submeasure on ![]()
and full classes ![]()
![]()
![]()
. The starting – point of our consideration is the following
observation of the work Estrada – Kanwal, [3] : let
be a series with positive terms. If for each
with
we have
, then
. This result is formulated in a stronger form in the work
[6]. There it is shown, that in last result the function d can be replaced by
the function u (uniform density). Consequently, if series with positive terms
convergences for each
where A is set of
null uniform density then it convergences on N. In the proof of this assertion we use the fact that uniform
density of a set
is a compact
submeasure. We also show that the upper Alexanders density is a compact
submeasure and the class of all sets
with
is a full class.
We recall the concept of asymptotic, uniform and upper Alexanders densities, further the concept of submeasures and full classes.
Let
. Denote by
,
the number of elements of the set
. Then the numbers
and
are called the lower
and upper asymptotic density of the set
, respectively. If
, then
is said to be the
asymptotic density of the set
.
Further we put
. It can be shown that there exist
(the lower and upper
uniform density of the set
, cf. [1] ). It can
be easily seen that
.
We
recall the concept of a submeasure on ![]()
. A function m : ![]()
![]()
is said to be a
compact submeasure on ![]()
provided that
satisfies the following
four conditions:
![]()
, (cf. [5]).
for each
we have
for each
there exists a
decomposition
of
such that
for each
.
Theorem A. Paštéka 1990.
Let
be a compact
submeasure on![]()
and
a series with positive terms.
If for each
with
we have
, then
.
The
upper asymptotic density
is a compact
submeasure on ![]()
. Therefore as a consequence of Theorem A we obtain the
following result.
Theorem B. Estrada – Kanwal 1986.
Let
be a series with positive terms.
If for each
with
we have
, then
.
The
natural question arises whether the function
can be replaced in Theorem B. by the function
. The following theorem give positive answer to this
question.
Theorem 1.
Let
be a series with positive terms.
If for each
with
we have
, then
.
Proof.
It can be easily cheeked that
is a compact
submeasure. Especially if
then we choose an
such that
. Then
is the desired
decomposition of
in the definition of
the compact submeasure.
In
what follows we assume
and
. If
, we put
and
where
and
is the characteristic
function of A. The
denotes upper, the
lower Alexanders
density of the set
. If
, then
is said to be the
Alexanders density of the set
. Taking
the function
will mean upper
asymptotic density
, the upper logarithmic density
, respectively.
Theorem 2.
Let
.
Suppose that
.
Then
is a compact
submeasure.
Finally, we recall the concept of a full class. A class ![]()
![]()
![]()
is said to be a full class if the following conditions are
satisfied:
1)
N ![]()
2)
if ![]()
and
, then ![]()
![]()
3)
if
is a series with
positive terms and
for each set ![]()
, then
.
A trivial example of a full class is ![]()
. Further the class
of all
with
is a full class (see
Theorem B.) an analogous statement holds for the class
of all
with
(see Theorem 1.). Note that
according to
. It can be shown that this inclusion is strict ( Example:
put
).
Theorem 3.
If
sequence
have a bounded
variation,
, then class
is a full.
Rerences.
[1] Alexander,R. : Density and multiplicative structure of sets of
integers. Acta Arithm. XII. (1967), 321 – 329.
[2] Mačaj, M. – Mišík, L. – Šalát, T. – Tomanová, J.: On class of densities of sets of positive
integers. AMUC LXXII. (2003), 213 – 221.
[3] Estrada, R. – Kanwal, R.P.: Series that converge on sets of null
density, Proc. Amer. Math.
Soc. 97 (1986), 682 – 686.
[4] Paštéka, M.: Convergence of series and submeasures of the set of positive
integers,
Math. Slov. 40 (1990), 273 – 278.
[5] Sember, J.J.- Freedman, A. R.: On summing sequences of 0’s and 1’s, Rockey Mountain
J. Math. 11 (1981), 419 – 425.
[6] Šalát, T. – Visnyai, T.: Subadditive measures on N and the convergence of series with
positive terms, Acta Mathematica 6 (2003), 43 – 52.